July 13, 2005
-
Secret Agent Plame Hijacks Press Briefing Room
WASHINGTON (AP) – “President Bush said Wednesday that he will withhold judgment about top aide Karl Rove’s involvement in leaking the identity of a CIA agent until a federal criminal investigation into the matter is complete.”
The Valerie Plame case has been all over the White house Press Briefing Room these past couple days. The liberal media almost attacked the White house Press Secretary today in the capital. This is what the media’s been waiting for. They don’t care that no evidence has been exposed to suggest Deputy Chief of Staff Rove did anything wrong. They don’t care that it hasn’t even been proven that Plame is a covert agent. All they care about is embarrassing Rove and the administration.
Morrison
Comments (7)
you are black and republikkkan – i have no respect for you what-so-ever
damn, son read a damn history book instead of these white man lies
again, the medias job, over-react and try to expose everything. in this case overkill is better then underkill.
wait, wait…is this a nut in a humorous way? or are you trying to be mean here? what’s going on?!
Dude I love the new blogring
p.s. did you get your Club Gitmo Gear yet?
B.P. Riley: President-NCGV
a little harsh there win_or_lose173?
morrison,
i landed on ur site thru someone else, and as i was surfing thru it i saw the little discussion about the bombing in London. Now, I would have to agree with the one kid that made it a point not to point fingers towards “islamic” terrorists, as no one is 100% sure who is responsible, but what I really wanted to say is that this whole thing has been approached wrong from the start. President Bush has screwed this country over like I have never seen or heard- Firstly, it is a true fact that the Bush administration already had knowledge about an attack 36 days before 9/11 actually went down. Plus, Iraq and Al Quaeida are two different issues and there was no reason to mush them together. I’m sure u kno that the only reason Bush went into Iraq was not because he was threatened by their “weapons of mass distruction” that never existed but because he knew that it was a country weak enough to be taken over to control their oil. If not, why isn’t Bush in North Korea, Iran and multiple other countries? Exactly my point. Both of President Bushs elections were fixed, he has not benefited this country in anyway so far, and now there’s hundreds and thousands of innoccent Iraqi civilians dying for NOTHING. Yes, Saddam wasn’t all that, i agree, but whats happening now is far worse than when he was in power. This countries job is not to be policing the world. It is not. We are the most powerful, true, but we use that benefit to our advantage and go on ruining the rest of the world. thats why i cannot support this system anymore, and u being a republican at this point is just WHACK.
So where does this leave the UK? The UK was America’s bitch from the start, and they should NOT be surprised that they got attacked. yes, around 40 people died, correct? Why don’t you try looking @ Iraqi casualties…no one seems to give a hoot about that anymore. But when it happens in England, oh, no, Godforbid, NOT ENGLAND…..this whole country is corrupt, and all you have to do is look at the facts and figures. Don’t get me wrong. I don’t- by any means- support terrorists and extremists, but what this country is doing is just as retarded. There is no good guy anymore.
Feedback and opinions would be appreciated.
Thanks.
ps: ur a republican………..that breaks my heart….
http://anti-liberal.org/index.php?p=15
Read that, report on it!