September 6, 2005
-
Senate To Begin Hearings
Don’t Get Your Hopes Up, These Are Liberals..
"The Senate will begin confirmation hearings next Monday for John Roberts to be the Supreme Court's chief justice, one week after President Bush selected him to replace the late William H. Rehnquist as the 17th leader of the nation's highest court."
"Bush urged senators to confirm Roberts before the court session resumes Oct. 3 and said he was considering many candidates for filling a second vacancy. "The list is wide open," Bush said."
So next Monday seems to be the date in which John Roberts will participate in these confirmation hearings. I’ve gotten some emails along with comments on this blog from concerned conservatives about this. While one could argue maybe Roberts wasn’t the best choice for chief, but I want to urge you to trust your President, he has vowed to come through, he will come through. I understand your concern, but you need to have faith in this President.
Now, these hearings are going to be exactly what you expect them to be. The wacky senate libs will forget how they preached for a fair up or down vote for Ruth Bader Ginsberg and they will pull up dirt on Roberts, they will ask him question they urged Ginsberg to ignore. Don’t get your hopes up, don’t put your faith into these liberals because they will continue to show the highest level of hypocrisy, that is protected and guarded by a left leaning media. The left simply cannot allow an fair up or down vote for this nominee. This is all they have. Without the courts, liberalism fails. They cant win elections, so they use activist judges to legislate opinion.
Morrison
Comments (14)
*yawn*
*yawn*
LOL!
great post Morrison! your right about the left, all they have is activist judges!
I was kind of hoping for Scalia, but I have faith that President Bush knows who he is appointing.
I would make a statement but the lunacy in your own convictions already make it a bigger joke than I could provide...
like i said on my other one, i don't think there's a chance in the world he'll get confirmed by oct. 3...so mr. lib is going to take over for a while...stevens, maybe? because of seniority? we need to kill the filibuster...judicial, at least...
Bush should suggest that if they play nice he will give a little on the next nomination. Of course they won't play nice, and so then he can name some arch conservative type. Yeah. Beat them over the head until they start to see reason. Is that possible?
Roberts was a wise political pick, even though Scalia or Thomas deserved it. I'm interested in the E-mails you've received, would you mind sharing some of them?
hahaha i LOVe the cartoonish proportions the ticker brings to this website! What with Mike's penchant for garnering attention and comments, I am surprised at the vanilla nature of this post. Better luck next time.
( *yawn* again )
Everyone was hoping for Scalia and/or Thomas...
Ya know what I hope to see??
Judge Judy on the Supreme Court....now that would be weird....and she would be handing a lot of ass whooping too.
how about that guy from Texas Justice of that Judge Joe Brown?
"Bush should suggest that if they play nice he will give a little on the next nomination. "
I find it interesting how people complain that Bush want's to appoint conservatives, yet no one complained when Democrat president's appointed liberals....................................besides, the Supreme Court has been under liberal control for the better part of a century, why not give conservative control for the same amount of time and then you might actually get a balance in laws.
no one complained when a Democrat President appointed liberals? Wow... you must not remember the time then... Clinton and Orrin Hatch got together to discuss candidates since there were rumblings of discontent...
You say that the SCOTUS has been under liberal control for the better part of a century, which I will disagree with just from the view point of your idea of liberal v. conservative is probably different than mine... however to deny that the previous court (from 1994 to 2005) was probably one of the most balanced courts we've had...
Comments are closed.