September 13, 2005

  • Ryan From Ohio, Conservative Republican Who Gets It


    "Well in the first quote Ted (Sen. Kennedy Of Mass.) said (I'm dumbing this down to help make it easier to understand) "We shouldn't ask a nominee any questions about their views and such", then in the next quote Ted says "He needs to tell us all about his views and such". Now, when the first quote was regarding a Democrat and the second was regarding a Republican that would be....*say it all together now children*....HYPOCRISY!!"


    -Ryan


        You know, libs like to complicate things. Kerry did it in 04, it’s a common tactic. Even something as simple as two quotes that clearly contradict each other can be molded into something completely different by using this tactic. The truth is, this tactic is phony, Ted Kennedy is a hypocrite. The left always have claimed "oh, the southern states are not intelligent enough to make an informed decision" or "oh, these white bread conservatives don’t know a thing about politics" But isn’t odd, isn’t it weird that these same white bread redneck southern conservatives are the ones that have to "dumb things down" for the libs?


         Don’t you find it odd that the same people who the left claims to be "incompetent" or "stupid" are the same ones explaining to them something as simple as two contradicting quotes? Im going to tell you why these dopey kook libs who pop up on this blog seconds after I post, Im going to tell you why they can not and will not call this hypocrisy. If they call this hypocrisy then that means Ted Kennedy is a hypocrite. If Ted Kennedy is a hypocrite that means he’s opposing this nominee for simply partisan reasons. They will not allow us to pinpoint them on this because they are opposing this nominee for simply partisan reasons! It’s the only reason! Do you honestly believe that if John Roberts were a democrat, Ted Kennedy would demand he give clear answers? Do you honestly believe that? As I said yesterday, Its getting to the point where this kind of hypocrisy from the left isn’t even noticeable anymore.


    Morrison

September 12, 2005

  • Liberal Hypocrisy


    Its Become So Common, Its Not Even Noticeable Anymore...


    "We have to respect that any nominee to the Supreme Court would have to defer any comments on any matters, which are either before the court or very likely to be before the court,"


    -Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy 1967.


    "What little we know about his views and values lends even greater importance and urgency to his responsibility to provide the Senate and the American people with clear answers."


    -Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy 2004.


         So here we have yet another example of liberal hypocrisy. This is just further proof that the left is opposing this nomination for solely partisan reasons. They cannot stand by and let Roberts receive a "fair up or down vote". They cannot allow it. They will not allow it. You see, what the left doesn’t seem to understand is that, this President won the election, he has the constitutional authority to nominate someone to the High Court. Or does he? I mean just by reading liberal blogs the day after the election, you got the feeling that Bush didn’t even win. There were millions of conspiracy theories out there about machines being hacked and kooky stuff like that. And even with that nonsense floating around the liberal blogosphere, libs still kept reminding us of the 2000 election. So if you really accept the current liberal philosophy on certain issues, I can understand why you wouldn’t want to be fair with this nominee. Because according to the left, Bush shouldn’t have won in 2000, therefore he probably wouldn’t have run in 2004, therefore we shouldn’t be fair towards his nominee. Aha, its all coming to me now.


    Morrison

September 11, 2005

  • Morrison Report Remembers


    4 Years Ago Today



     



     



     



     



     



     



     



     



     



     



     



     



     



     



     



     


September 10, 2005

  • Rush: "Kathleen Blanco Hates Black People"


    "Kathleen Blanco is white, correct? George Bush is white, correct? At least according to the pictures I see. The majority of the residents of New Orleans, black, right? According to the census and the pictures I see, right? Yes. Okay. Hurricane comes. Most of the suffering that we are shown is being incurred by black people in New Orleans who are said to be poor, who are said to be black, and about whom it is said Bush is happy this has happened. Bush doesn't care about black people. Kanye West and the rest of the civil rights leadership echoes this, and why? Well, because Bush is white."


    "Oh, that's outrageous! you say. Well, is it any more outrageous than saying George W. Bush, who is not even in Louisiana, hates black people? They're the ones that had something to do with it. They're the ones promising black people to elevate them out of those circumstances, take them to the mountaintop. That just didn't pull. It must be because they don't like black people, must be because they actually want black people to suffer. Maybe it's because they're racists." 


     -Transcript

September 8, 2005

  • Gallup Poll Shocker


    Americans Don’t Accept Lib Philosophy


    "Blame Game -- 13% said George W. Bush is "most responsible for the problems in New Orleans after the hurricane"; 18% said "federal agencies"; 25% said "state and local officials"; 38% said "no one is to blame"; 6% had no opinion. -- 29% said that "top officials in the federal agencies responsible for handling emergencies should be fired"; 63% said they should not; 8% had no opinion."


    -Drudge


       Isn’t this just shocking? After all the claims that this President was the one responsible, after all the kooky liberal conspiracy theories running out there, you would think that a substantial amount of people would accept the rhetoric of the left wing media. According to this Gallup Poll only 13% of Americans believe this President is the one to blame for the problems after the hurricane. In fact, even a bigger shocker, 25% percent of Americans believe the responsibility falls on the elected democrats of Louisiana and New Orleans.


          The fact is, that Americans have not accepted the liberal philosophy on this hurricane. Americans do not believe this President is to blame for this hurricane, Americans do not believe this President is a racist. 38% of Americans say no one is to blame. You see, Americans don’t view this as a political situation. They just don’t. They see this as a natural disaster, which is exactly what it is. They understand that Man cannot create hurricane, they understand that instead of politicizing this disaster, we should be helping with the relief. This Gallup Poll is just another smack in the face for those on the left.


    Morrison

September 7, 2005

  • "New Orleans myths: The numbers tell a different story"


    The American Thinker reports on Katrina..


        "The mythology on Katrina is now out there: only blacks were victims, Bush ignored the city because of this, the levees broke because of Bush budget cuts, the response was inadequate because the National Guard was in Iraq.  In all case, these are new urban legends." 


       "For some, what happened this week is a big plus. It has weakened the President politically, and that is all that matters. The President and his team are certainly not blame-free. But if some people think that dealing with what happened this week could have been straightforward, clear, clean and quick, they are divorced from reality. America has never lost a major city before. "


    -Article


    Morrison

September 6, 2005

  • Senate To Begin Hearings


    Don’t Get Your Hopes Up, These Are Liberals..


    "The Senate will begin confirmation hearings next Monday for John Roberts to be the Supreme Court's chief justice, one week after President Bush selected him to replace the late William H. Rehnquist as the 17th leader of the nation's highest court."


    "Bush urged senators to confirm Roberts before the court session resumes Oct. 3 and said he was considering many candidates for filling a second vacancy. "The list is wide open," Bush said."


    -BreitBart


        So next Monday seems to be the date in which John Roberts will participate in these confirmation hearings. I’ve gotten some emails along with comments on this blog from concerned conservatives about this. While one could argue maybe Roberts wasn’t the best choice for chief, but I want to urge you to trust your President, he has vowed to come through, he will come through. I understand your concern, but you need to have faith in this President.


    President George W. Bush and Judge John G. Roberts enjoy an early morning coffee at the residence Wednesday, July 20, 2005, in the White House. The President named Judge Roberts as his nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday night. White House photo by Eric Draper


          Now, these hearings are going to be exactly what you expect them to be. The wacky senate libs will forget how they preached for a fair up or down vote for Ruth Bader Ginsberg and they will pull up dirt on Roberts, they will ask him question they urged Ginsberg to ignore. Don’t get your hopes up, don’t put your faith into these liberals because they will continue to show the highest level of hypocrisy, that is protected and guarded by a left leaning media. The left simply cannot allow an fair up or down vote for this nominee. This is all they have. Without the courts, liberalism fails. They cant win elections, so they use activist judges to legislate opinion.


    Morrison

September 5, 2005

  • Bush Picks Roberts For Chief


    "President Bush today nominated John Roberts to succeed William H. Rehnquist as chief justice, and called on the Senate to confirm him before the Supreme Court opens its fall term on Oct. 3."


    "The swift move would promote to the Supreme Court's top job a newcomer who currently is being considered as one of eight associate justices."


    -AP


    More on this tomorrow

  • Rice Denies Race Factor


    "MOBILE, ALA. - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice Sunday toured areas of her home state hit by Hurricane Katrina and disputed claims her government had been slow to respond."


    "Rice, the most senior black member of President Bush's Cabinet, said she did not believe race had anything to do with how quickly the government reacted to Katrina"


    -Drudge



        So Dr. Rice here has echoed the words of the administration in assuring the American people that race was not a factor in this relief effort. The left see’s this disaster as a way to gain political capital over this administration. Instead of focusing on how to better handle the situation in the Gulf, they have devoted most of their time to politicizing this disaster.


    Morrison

September 4, 2005

  • A Second Vacancy


    This Is Going To Be Bush’s Legacy


    "Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, who oversaw the high court's conservative shift and presided over the impeachment trial of President Clinton, died Saturday evening. He was 80 years old and had spent 33 years on the Supreme Court."


    "Rehnquist's death opens a rare second vacancy on the nation's highest court and gives President Bush, whose election Rehnquist helped decide, an opportunity shape the makeup of the court for years to come"


        As I watched the Katrina coverage last night, a news alert popped us informing me of the death of William Rehnquist. This is going to be why people are going to remember this President. This is going to be Bush’s legacy. Appointing two judges on the Supreme Court. Of course the libs will go crazy, they will complain, they will desperately search for evidence that suggest even the most radical of claims. Even though Rehnquist was a conservative, even though he didn’t agree with Roe vs Wade, the left is going to denounce this appointee simply because he was appointed by this President. And I believe this President will come through. He’s already received heat from some on the right for the Roberts nomination, nominating someone to the court who isn’t a strong conservative to replace Rehnquist doesn’t seem likely.


    Morrison